| The 
        most beautiful equation in mathematics
 
 
 by Keith Devlin
 Bertrand Russell, the famous English mathematician and philosopher, wrote 
        in his 1918 book Mysticism and Logic:
 Mathematics, rightly viewed, possesses not only truth, but supreme 
        beautya beauty cold and austere, like that of sculpture, without 
        appeal to any part of our weaker nature, without the gorgeous trappings 
        of painting or music, yet sublimely pure, and capable of a stern perfection 
        such as only the greatest art can show.
 
 Mathematics, the so-called science of patterns, is a way of looking at 
        the world, not only the physical, biological, and sociological world we 
        inhabit, but also the inner world of our minds and thoughts. Mathematics' 
        greatest success has undoubtedly been in the physical domain. Yet, as 
        an entirely human creation, the study of mathematics is ultimately a study 
        of humanity itself. For none of the entities that form the substrate of 
        mathematics exist in the physical world. The numbers, the points, the 
        lines and planes, the surfaces, the geometric figures, the functions, 
        and so forth are pure abstractions that exist only in the mind.
 
 At the supreme level of abstraction where mathematical ideas may be found, 
        seemingly different concepts sometimes turn out to have surprisingly intimate 
        connections. There is, surely, no greater illustration of this than the 
        equation discovered in 1748 by the great Swiss mathematician Leonhard 
        Euler.
 Eulers equation
 
 
   
 connects the five most significant and most ubiquitous constants in mathematics: 
        e, the base of the natural logarithms; i, the square root of 1; 
        þ, the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter; 1, the 
        identity for multiplication; and 0, the identity for addition.
 
 The number 1, that most concrete of numbers, is the beginning of counting 
        and the basis of all commerce, engineering, science, and music. The number 
        0 began life as a mere place holder in computation, a marker for something 
        that is absent, but eventually gained acceptance as a symbol for the ultimate 
        abstraction: nothingness. As 1 is to counting and 0 to arithmetic, þ is 
        to geometry, the measure of that most perfectly symmetrical of shapes, 
        the circle  though like an eager young debutante, þ has a habit 
        of showing up in the most unexpected of places. As for e, to lift her 
        veil you need to plunge into the depths of calculus  humankinds 
        most successful attempt to grapple with the infinite. And i, that most 
        mysterious square root of 1, surely nothing in mathematics could 
        seem further removed from the familiar world around us.
 
 Five different numbers, with different origins, built on very different 
        mental conceptions, invented to address very different issues. And yet 
        all come together in one glorious, intricate equation, each playing with 
        perfect pitch to blend and bind together to form a single whole that is 
        far greater than any of the parts. A perfect mathematical composition.
 
 Like a Shakespearean sonnet that captures the very essence of love, or 
        a painting that brings out the beauty of the human form that is far more 
        than just skin deep, Eulers equation reaches down into the very 
        depths of existence. It brings together mental abstractions having their 
        origins in very different aspects of our lives, reminding us once again 
        that things that connect and bind together are ultimately more important, 
        more valuable, and more beautiful than things that separate.
 
 Keith Devlin, guest lecturer for the Wabash Center for Inquiry in the 
        Liberal Arts, is executive director of the Center for the Study of Language 
        and Information at Stanford University and is a contributor National Public 
        Radios Weekend Edition.
 Return to INCENSE
 Return 
        to the table of contents   |