Wabash College's Fall Moot Court competition offers Wabash students an excellent opportunity to engage in legal argumentation with training and support from fellow Wabash Alumni who are now practicing attorneys.

Students are given materials and coaching necessary for arguing a hypothetical case before a panel of judges. Competition comes from fellow students who are assigned the opposing argument. Prior legal knowledge or experience is not necessary for participation. The event is geared for undergraduates and research materials are prepared and distributed to each participant. In addition, tutoring sessions run by practicing attorneys are provided for those interested.

In short, this is a great opportunity to add to your resume, gain experience, and meet/work with Wabash Alumni.

This year's case involves the constitutionality of opening sessions of a state legislative body with sectarian prayer given by volunteer clergy. 
A group of taxpayers has sued the Speaker of the Independence House of Representatives, claiming that many of the prayers delivered during the 2005 session of the Independence General Assembly violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. 
The Speaker has defended the lawsuit by saying that the taxpayers have not been injured by any of the prayers and therefore do not have any right or standing to bring the suit. 
The Speaker also argues that the prayers, and the process by which clergy are chosen to deliver the prayers, are entirely consistent with the Establishment Clause, particularly in light of a proper historical understanding of the Clause.

Links to the Case and Hints (Word documents):

2006 Case authored by Rick Pitts ‘83

2006 Hints Sheet for Participants.